Subject: Dumbing down Polynesia
Dumbing down Polynesia, or the betrayal of history.
According to the conventional view, most of Polynesia was settled
during the last 2000 years by Polynesian-speakers, who were arriving
to virgin uninhabited islands. Only one wave of human settlement is
allowed. Polynesians were arriving to those uninhabited islands, and
gradually developing their new and unique island civilisations in a
variety of ways.
The prevailing view is Isolationist, since those first explorers are
often believed to have lost their navigational skills quickly, and to
have lost touch with their cousins on other islands. So the prevailing
view is biased towards "local development". And it is also obviously
biased towards a rather simplistic gradualist and linear cultural
evolution.
The prevailing view is islanders pottering about on their little
isolated islands -- all peace and quiet -- not bothered by any scary
intruders from that big and bad outside world, and not bothering
anyone in turn, just minding their own business and exercising their
"inventiveness" to develop all kinds of wonderful things "locally".
Sounds somehow just like an ideal mirror-image of a sheltered academic
scholar on his/her own little overspecialised turf, in other words...
(But any such resemblance of these two images may be purely
coincidental, of course.) In any case, it is well known that, to
complete the parallel with the islanders, any outside intruders to
such private little academic idylls are welcome like the plague, also,
and to be resisted accordingly.
The biggest enemy to be resisted in all this is the American Indian,
of course. Any cultural influence from America is the highest form of
heresy in Polynesian anthropology. So the scholars have built
themselves a very sturdy Berlin Wall between Polynesia and America,
and they have mounted the defensive towers fully armed to resist any
possible invaders. (One invader, the sweet potato [kumara], had
slipped past the Wall somehow, so the scholars pretend that he's just
an isolated freak unrelated to anything else, and to be treated
accordingly.)
But the problem is that the archaeological, genetic, linguistic, and
ethnological evidence on the ground fits very poorly with this idyllic
picture. The problem is that archaeology indicates a number of rather
abrupt rises and falls of civilisation (e.g. three distinct cultural
periods on Rapanui). Genetically, the islanders appear to be rather
mixed, and their physical appearance shows great variability.
Linguistically, there are clear traces of a non-Polynesian tongue in
eastern Polynesia (see below). Native historical traditions on various
islands are telling the stories that often fly in the face of the
academic dogma (guess who usually wins in such confrontations?).
When first European travellers started to arrive to Polynesia towards
1600, but especially after 1700, they immediately observed on many
Polynesian islands huge stoneworks that usually laid abandoned and in
ruins, apparently for a very long time already. Sometimes even whole
isolated islands with impressive stone structures and artefacts were
found entirely depopulated and long-abandoned (Necker Island near
Hawaii, Malden Island near the Marquesas, etc.).
The islanders in the area usually told European visitors that those
ancient constructions were built in the earliest era of their islands'
history, and that they knew very little about them. Often they told
the Europeans that they were built by another people, the Menehune,
unrelated to the Polynesians. They were agricultural peoples, and some
of their ancient crops (American cotton, pineapples, tomatoes, etc.)
were still growing in the wild state, near their former habitations,
long abandoned by the present inhabitants, if any.
The true story of Polynesia appears to be the story of a large
geographical area where various population groups were arriving from
different directions, and where civilisations were repeatedly rising
and falling. Clearly there were many outside invasions and many brutal
wars. There had been sophisticated and flowering ancient civilisations
that came to an abrupt end. Just like in the rest of the world, in
other words...
You will find no trace of any of that in the conventional version of
Polynesian history that is being taught in our Universities. Because
this is the dumbed-down version. The scholars don't want to hear
anything different. Private convenience and academic politics seem to
represent their guiding heuristic. I call this the betrayal of the
historical method by the whole profession.
Those mysterious ancient peoples who lived and laboured on those
islands, who built those impressive constructions, who planted those
"aberrant" crops, and who then passed into the night, probably not so
quietly, still remain officially unknown and nameless (although some
traces of their heritage can be discerned here and there). They are
still wandering ghosts -- they've been erased from history. Nobody
cares about them anymore, certainly not the Scholars.
Some good Necker Island info:
http://tribalsite.com/articles/necker.htm
A little about Malden Island (the place that was actually nuked some
time in the 50s by the British!):
http://iserver.saddleback.cc.ca.us/div/mse/day20.html
And here's some of that "aberrant non-Polynesian vocabulary" as given
by Langdon, in his LOST CARAVEL. For full context, see my old post:
forbidden linguistics
Author: Yuri Kuchinsky
Date: 1999/02/01
Forum: sci.archaeology
ashes tapurena
bone keinga
canoe aveke
cloud paku
to count kamoke
dark ruki
dog ngaeke
egg touo
fat paneke
fault veke
finger mane-manea
fire neki, korure, rotika
fish paru
fishhook tate
to follow utari
forest puka
fruit teke
girl manania
good viru
great toreu
head pepenu
heart upoupo
husband kaifa
kidney pouru
ladder kega
large tuetue
little korereka
liver kerikeri
man hakoi
moon kavake
mud niganiga
oil more
rain toiti
road keka
salt toau
sea takarari
to see hipa
slave titi
to sleep piko
smoke kaihora
son makaro
spirit mahoi, horohoro
stone konao
stupid kama
sweat togari
tongue maveu
tree mohoki
water komo
wind rohaki
woman erire, morire
Yuri Kuchinsky -=- Toronto -=- http://www.globalserve.net/~yuku
A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely
rearranging their prejudices -=O=- William James
Click here to go one level up in the directory.